Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  
          The Members       Trial Transcript       Best & Brightest       Bad News For Everybody  

Tainted jury? - You tell us.

In a courtroom with a federal judge, a dozen federal attorneys, a group of defendant, and spectators, a nervous juror entered the courtroom, separated from the other jurors, and had the courage to tell the Court that people were using improper influence in the jury room. The Court snapped at this literally shaking woman.

With uncommon bravado, she insisted that people were making decisions for other people. Again, the Court's voice rose, saying, "Ah! Ah! I don't want to hear it!" and sent her back into the jury room for deliberations!   One might think the lawyers would be leaping.     Not a peep from any of the attorneys present. Nearly a dozen defense lawyers, and not one of them raised their voice.

It's edifying to illuminate an undeniably eerie connection between these federally funded defenders:
Every one of the federally-paid defense lawyers continues to be widely known within their legal fraternatiy as lawyers who lose most or all of their assigned cases. It is particularly rare for a federal trial requiring so many defense lawyers to have such an uneven distrubution, so many demonstrably inept lawyers assigned to one set of defendants. No rich mix of mediocrity and excellence here, only a surfeit of the former.

That has led to the claim that these federally-paid defense lawyers were not intentionally tolerating such perversion of the jury process,
that in fact they did not know how to respond to a court that was tolerating so many different oddities and irregularities in the process, from voir dire right through to the end
multiple issues of jury interference and subornment, as direct as any arbiter of law or ethics could ask for.

At one point, another juror notified the Court that her Mercedes Benz had been hit and damaged in the courthouse parking lot, and that she was sure the hit and run had been committed by one of the defendants, Annette Haley, with Haley's Mercedes Benz. Never mind that Haley had numerous outside investments; none of the other defendants except the publisher of Who's Who had ever owned a Mercedes. Yet the impression on the jury was clearly significant, more so with a juror carping in every private jury session that a rich defendant's Mercedes had hit and damaged her car, AND had denied it and "Who's going to pay for it?," and.... ... and this does not bode well.

After a few days of complaints, and notes to the Court about who she should submit her money claim to, that juror was finally released, long after her damage was done.

name="#juryo"> Is it possible for employees of a complainant to sit on the jury? The use of the plural is both intended and accurate: although the U.S. Postal Service was the de jure complainant in this case, efforts to secure jury seats for postal employees succeeded, with nary a peep from the federally-paid defense attorneys.   With a sixteen-week trial, and enormous pressure from above, it is clear what their influence effected.

The jury heard days and days and more days of testimony about Bruce Gordon's egregiously lavish lifestyle and ninety-dollar socks; followed by weeks and more weeks of testimony about his financial and ethical chicanery. Talk about poisoning people with guilt by association! Not one of the defendants earned in a year what Gordon spent in a week, never spent personal time with him nor broke bread with him, yet the jury concluded that if Gordon could live this way, his employees must have been doing the same thing. Hundreds of hours of testimony focused exclusively on Gordon and his financial picture.

  When several jurors mouthed literally tearful apologives to defendants and defense counsel after the end of trial, it became clear that jurors had been demonstrably usurped of their authority and lawful obligations, ergo provably against their will. The appropriate word is 'arrogate.' This case is one for the books, indeed.  



See the numbers yourself         Strictly Politics        Judge?         Start Page

Incredible list of alleged victims             Tiny sampling of Managing Directors     

Cross Benjamin      Cross Springer       Direct Quote     Dirty Jury?

Million-dollar con man testifying to stay out of prison

America's Best & Brightest     Main Page       Con THESE People?!!      

      More comment     Censored       Masters and Millionaires

Censored        Back to Top of Page      
Meanwhile, you can feed people NOW with a free click
Best Shortcuts Approach Help TheHungerSite Button

  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  
  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  

  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  
  Keep our heroes alive by  LIVING,   DOING  more!    Remember 911day.  

It is not difficult to describe the Who's Who Registry debacle,
the scandal of abject government corruptibility, including but by no means limited to
a scurrilous lout named Parker on the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, clearly for hire,
in sum one of the dirtiest and most corrupt federal trials in American history.

With pre-trial hearings rushed through December, the trial began in January and did not conclude until the final week in March.
Still, not a word from the media on what was alleged to be the largest scam in American history,
wherein seventy thousand of the brightest, most accomplished humans allegedly "fell victim" to telemarketing scammers,
and loved their memberships so much that forty thousands of them renewed and/or upgraded their memberships

Obviously, they got value, or they would not have returned in such stunning and historically unprecedented numbers.
Call the White House today. Please, demand pardons for the Best Shortcuts Approach"Who's Who-ers."

Can you imagine being on trial where your name is mentioned in the paperwork itself as "et alia?"
Convicted of conspiring over eight years with defendants you never met, heard of, or even knew of at all?

Never mind half the trial having nothing to do with the sales defendants. How about NINETY-NINE-PLUS percent?
That's not a misprint. Not even one page in a hundred, of evidence, of claims, of testimony, of the transcript itself,
not even one page in a hundred related to the actions, intentions, motivations, or words of the six sales defendants.
Tainted jury to the sleeping judge who'd already reviewed this case for two years and dismissed the charges!!
The same judge, Arthur Spatt, found that no crime had taken place, dismissing the charges,
only to have the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals reinstate the charges and, get this...
REFUSING TO HEAR AN APPEAL, despite there being more than a dozen grievous errors.
You're asked to call for an Executive Pardon. Please, raise your voices.

Bruce Gordon's rapacious greed and deceptions, his IRS and corporate finagling ad infinium ad nauseum,
Reed Elsevier's rapacious greed for more Who's Who, and the blazing rage of its owns that Who's Who Worldwide Registry,
a putative upstart, went far past Reed Elsevier's ten thousand listees, with Who's Who Worldwide creating a genuine membership,
one that had seventy-four thousand members at the moment government corruption vis-a-vis Reed Elsevier crushed WWW Registry.
THOSE are the primary pieces of this trial. The sales defendants, far below Gordon's arena of machinations, are not even named directly;
they are listed on the complaint and indictment and charges as "et alia," working-class pawns who did their jobs with distinction and excellence.

An adult son committing suicide says something about both the child and the parents.
In Gordon's case, his wife became dreadfully and terminally ill, so after all those years, dumped her.
A son committed suicide. Several years later, when Gordon's second son committed suicide in his twenties,
Gordon actually went to his sister to ask to borrow money of bury his son, knowing the money was for other uses.
Can you imagine such a human actually sharing the details of his tax and corporate finagling with ANY of his hundreds,
that's right, hundreds of employees? This was no fly-by-night, it was a very large operation in Lake Success, New York,
in one of the wealthiest business districts of Long Island's so-called "gold coast," located, in fact, right by the "Miracle Mile"
made so famous by Billy Joel in his anthem titled, "It's s Still Rock 'N Roll To Me, a song encompassing Long Island's blatant wealth.

Dragging along six of his best salespeople, although the government never charged the "slick" salespeople,
those who were fired for not observing the highest standards of ethical conduct demanded at Who's Who Worldwide.
Please, help save the names, the reputations, and in some cases the very lives of the real victims in this dirty case.
There is no pressure in the world like public pressure, and with all of the infringements upon our rights,
and with all the excessive zeal of those who with poor or selfish agendas, your help is solicited,
from the best of your suggestions, to the loudest of your voice,
please stand up and be heard clearly on a pardon today.